<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>fat burner.net &#187; Lipolyze</title>
	<atom:link href="http://fatburner.net/tag/lipolyze/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://fatburner.net</link>
	<description>2010&#039;s Best Fat Burners &#124; Fat Burner Reviews from Real Consumers</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 30 Aug 2010 22:25:08 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Lipolyze</title>
		<link>http://fatburner.net/fat-burners/lipolyze/</link>
		<comments>http://fatburner.net/fat-burners/lipolyze/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Jan 2009 20:22:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Fat Burners]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Lipolyze]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[lipolyze review]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fatburner.net/fat-burners/lipolyze/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Is Lipolyze the Best Fat Burner? Lipolyze claims it is “best categorized as a caloric wasting supplement”. They don’t go into detail about how there supplement is a “caloric waster” but they do say over and over again that stimulants don’t promote permanent weight loss and can actually cause you to lose muscle. This may [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://fatburner.net/fat-burners/lipolyze/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
